Impact of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema on lung cancer risk and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a syndrome characterized by the coexistence of emphysema and fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). The aim of this study was to examine the effect of CPFE on lung cancer risk and lung cancer-related mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer at five community hospitals between June 2006 and December 2021. Patients were followed until lung cancer-related death, other-cause death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study. We used the cumulative incidence function with Gray's test and Fine-Gray regression analysis for survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 563 patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer were included (82 RA patients and 481 non-RA patients). The prevalence of CPFE was higher in RA patients than in non-RA patients (40.2% vs.10.0%) at lung cancer diagnosis. During follow-up, the crude incidence rate of lung cancer-related death was 0.29 and 0.10 per patient-year (PY) in RA and non-RA patients, and 0.32 and 0.07 per PY in patients with CPFE and patients without ILD or emphysema, respectively. The estimated death probability at 5 years differed between RA and non-RA patients (66% vs. 32%, p<0.001) and between patients with CPFE and patients without ILD or emphysema (71% vs. 24%, p<0.001). In addition to clinical cancer stage and no surgery within 1 month, RA and CPFE were identified as independent predictive factors for increased lung cancer-related mortality (RA: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-4.76; CPFE: adjusted HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.24-3.23). CONCLUSIONS: RA patients with lung cancer had a higher prevalence of CPFE and increased cancer-related mortality compared with non-RA patients. Close monitoring and optimal treatment strategies tailored to RA patients with CPFE are important to improve the poor prognosis of lung cancer.

Lung cancer risk and occupational pulmonary fibrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Molecular pathways found to be important in pulmonary fibrosis are also involved in cancer pathogenesis, suggesting common pathways in the development of pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is pulmonary fibrosis from exposure to occupational carcinogens an independent risk factor for lung cancer? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases with over 100 search terms regarding occupational hazards causing pulmonary fibrosis was conducted. After screening and extraction, quality of evidence and eligibility criteria for meta-analysis were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: 52 studies were identified for systematic review. Meta-analysis of subgroups identified silicosis as a risk factor for lung cancer when investigating odds ratios for silicosis in autopsy studies (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.90) and for lung cancer mortality in patients with silicosis (OR 3.21, 95% CI 2.67-3.87). Only considering studies with an adjustment for smoking as a confounder identified a significant increase in lung cancer risk (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.34-1.87). However, due to a lack of studies including cumulative exposure, no adjustments could be included. In a qualitative review, no definitive conclusion could be reached for asbestosis and silicosis as independent risk factors for lung cancer, partly because the studies did not take cumulative exposure into account. INTERPRETATION: This systematic review confirms the current knowledge regarding asbestosis and silicosis, indicating a higher risk of lung cancer in exposed individuals compared to exposed workers without fibrosis. These individuals should be monitored for lung cancer, especially when asbestosis or silicosis is present.

Radiological pulmonary sequelae after COVID-19 and correlation with clinical and functional pulmonary evaluation: results of a prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Whether COVID-19 leads to long-term pulmonary sequelae or not remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of persisting radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-center study among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March and May 2020. Patients with residual symptoms or admitted into intensive care units were investigated 4 months after discharge by a chest CT (CCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). The primary endpoint was the rate of persistent radiological fibrotic lesions after 4 months. Secondary endpoints included further CCT evaluation at 9 and 16 months, correlation of fibrotic lesions with clinical and PFT evaluation, and assessment of predictive factors. RESULTS: Among the 1151 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 169 patients performed a CCT at 4 months. CCTs showed pulmonary fibrotic lesions in 19% of the patients (32/169). These lesions were persistent at 9 months and 16 months in 97% (29/30) and 95% of patients (18/19) respectively. There was no significant clinical difference based on dyspnea scale in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. However, PFT evaluation showed significantly decreased diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (p < 0.001) and total lung capacity (p < 0.001) in patients with radiological lesions. In multivariate analysis, the predictive factors of radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions were pulmonary embolism (OR = 9.0), high-flow oxygen (OR = 6.37), and mechanical ventilation (OR = 3.49). CONCLUSION: At 4 months, 19% of patients investigated after hospitalization for COVID-19 had radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions; they persisted up to 16 months. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Whether COVID-19 leads to long-term pulmonary sequelae or not remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of persisting radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The prevalence of persisting lesions after COVID-19 remains unclear. We assessed this prevalence and predictive factors leading to fibrotic lesions in a large cohort. The respiratory clinical impact of these lesions was also assessed. KEY POINTS: • Nineteen percent of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 had radiological fibrotic lesions at 4 months, remaining stable at 16 months. • COVID-19 fibrotic lesions did not match any infiltrative lung disease pattern. • COVID-19 fibrotic lesions were associated with pulmonary function test abnormalities but did not lead to clinical respiratory manifestation.

Riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica / Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Introducción: El riesgo cardiovascular es importante en la evaluación de los pacientes con esclerosis sistémica. Objetivo: Determinar el riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal y descriptivo en pacientes protocolizados del Servicio de Reumatología, en el período de enero 2020 a enero 2022. Se recogieron variables demográficas, clínicas, y se aplicó la calculadora de riesgo cardiovascular Framingham. Resultados: Se incluyeron 105 pacientes con edad media de 48,6 ± 15,3 años, el grupo más frecuente de 50 a 59 años (36,2 por ciento), predominó el sexo femenino 92,2 por ciento el color de piel blanca (74,3 por ciento), el tiempo de evolución fue mayor a 5 años (66,7 por ciento) con una media de 10,5 ± 9,3. El valor promedio de la escala de gravedad modificada de Medsger fue 5,1 ± 2,7 y el 72,4 por ciento con afectación leve. El fenómeno de Raynaud y la fibrosis pulmonar fueron más frecuentes con un 89,5 por ciento y 55,2 por ciento. El índice de Rodnan en promedio fue de 13,1 ± 8,0 y los reactantes de fase aguda normales en la mayoría. Los factores de riesgo cardiovascular más frecuentes fueron la HTA (30,2 por ciento) y dislipidemia (19,9 por ciento). El índice de masa corporal que predominó fue de peso adecuado (54,3 por ciento). Predominó el riesgo cardiovascular bajo según score de Framingham (86 por ciento). Existieron diferencias significativas entre las medias del tiempo de evolución y el riesgo cardiovascular (10 ± 6,9 frente a 9,6 ± 8,8 frente a 16,9 ± 10,8; p = 0,032). Conclusiones: El riesgo cardiovascular en los pacientes con esclerosis sistémica fue bajo(AU)

Introduction: Cardiovascular risk is important in the evaluation of patients with systemic sclerosis. Objective: To determine the cardiovascular risk in patients with systemic sclerosis. Methods: A cross-sectional and descriptive study was carried out in protocolized patients of Rheumatology Service, from January 2020 to January 2022. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, and Framingham cardiovascular risk calculator was used. Results: One hundred five patients were included with a mean age of 48.6 ± 15.3 years, the most frequent group was 50 to 59 years (36.2percent), female sex (92.2percent) predominated, as well as white skin color (74.3percent). The evolution time was greater than 5 years (66.7percent) with a mean of 10.5 ± 9.3. The average value of modified Medsger severity scale was 5.1 ± 2.7 and 72.4percent had mild involvement. Raynaud's phenomenon and pulmonary fibrosis were more common at 89.5percent and 55.2percent. Rodnan index on average was 13.1 ± 8.0 and the acute phase reactants were normal in the majority. The most frequent cardiovascular risk factors were HBP (30.2percent) and dyslipidemia (19.9percent). The predominant body mass index was adequate weight (54.3percent). Low cardiovascular risk according to Framingham score prevailed (86percent). There were significant differences between the mean duration of evolution and cardiovascular risk (10 ± 6.9 vs. 9.6 ± 8.8 vs. 16.9 ± 10.8; p = 0.032). Conclusions: The cardiovascular risk in patients with systemic sclerosis was low(AU)

Comorbidity of Pulmonary Fibrosis and COPD/Emphysema: Research Status, Trends, and Future Directions --------- A Bibliometric Analysis from 2004 to 2023.

Objective: The comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and COPD/emphysema has garnered increasing attention. However, no bibliometric analysis of this comorbidity has been conducted thus far. This study aims to perform a bibliometric analysis to explore the current status and cutting-edge trends in the field, and to establish new directions for future research. Methods: Statistical computing, graphics, and data visualization tools such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Biblimatrix, and WPS Office were employed. Results: We identified a total of 1827 original articles and reviews on the comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and COPD/emphysema published between 2004 and 2023. There was an observed increasing trend in publications related to this comorbidity. The United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom were the countries with the highest contributions. Professor Athol Wells and the University of Groningen had the highest h-index and the most articles, respectively. Through cluster analysis of co-cited documents, we identified the top 17 major clusters. Keyword analysis predicted that NF-κB, oxidative stress, physical activity, and air pollution might be hot spots in this field in the future. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis demonstrates a continuous increasing trend in literature related to the comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and COPD/emphysema. The research hotspots and trends identified in this study provide a reference for in-depth research in this field, aiming to promote the development of the comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and COPD/emphysema.

High prevalence of upper lung field pulmonary fibrosis radiologically consistent with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in patients with round atelectasis.

BACKGROUND: Upper-lung field pulmonary fibrosis (upper-PF), radiologically consistent with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE), was reported to develop in patients with a history of asbestos exposure and tuberculous pleurisy, indicating that chronic pleuritis is correlated with upper-PF development. Round atelectasis reportedly emerges after chronic pleuritis. This study aimed to clarify the association between round atelectasis and upper-PF. METHODS: We examined the radiological reports of all consecutive patients with round atelectasis between 2006 and 2018 and investigated the incidence of upper-PF development. RESULTS: Among 85 patients with round atelectasis, 21 patients (24.7%) were confirmed to finally develop upper-PF lesions. Upper-PF was diagnosed after round atelectasis recognition in more than half of the patients (13/21, 61.9%), whereas upper-PF and round atelectasis were simultaneously detected in the remaining 8 patients. At the time of round atelectasis detection, almost all patients (19/21, 90.5%) had diffuse pleural thickening and round atelectasis was commonly observed in non-upper lobes of 19 patients (90.5%). Fourteen patients had round atelectasis in unilateral lung, and the remaining 7 patients had round atelectasis in bilateral lungs. Among all 14 patients with unilateral round atelectasis, upper-PF developed on the same (n = 11) or both sides (n = 3). Thus, upper-PF emerged on the same side where round atelectasis was present (14/14, 100%). The autopsy of one patient revealed a thickened parietal-visceral pleura suggestive of chronic pleuritis. Subpleural fibroelastosis was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Upper-PF occasionally develops on the same side of round atelectasis. Upper-PF may develop as a sequela of chronic pleuritis.

Prevalence and risk factors of COVID-19 infection, mortality, and post-infection lung fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is often aggressive, with unfavorable outcomes for those with comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to assess the prevalence and risk factors of COVID-19 infection, mortality, and post-infection lung fibrosis in patients with COVID-19 infection who had T2DM. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included adult patients with T2DM who attended an endocrinology clinic and underwent testing for COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: Among 1039 included patients, the mean age was 59.5 ± 11.0 years and 429 (41.3%) were men. Overall, 87.1% of patients had received COVID-19 vaccination and 32.3% had confirmed COVID-19 infection. The COVID-19-related mortality was 3.0% and rate of post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis was 19.1%. Vaccination was associated with lower COVID-19-related mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0-0.3) and post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis risk (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). CONCLUSION: Patients with T2DM exhibited a high prevalence of COVID-19 infection and associated mortality. However, COVID-19 vaccines were beneficial in reducing the risks of COVID-19-related mortality and post-infection lung fibrosis in these patients. COVID-19 vaccines and boosters are recommended for patients with T2DM. Further studies involving larger study populations are necessary to validate these findings.

An increased risk of pulmonary hypertension in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). Whether the incidence of PH is increased in CPFE compared with pure pulmonary fibrosis or emphysema remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of PH in patients with CPFE compared to those with IPF or COPD/emphysema. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases for relevant studies focusing on the incidence of PH in patients with CPFE and IPF or emphysema. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to evaluate the differences in the clinical characteristics presence and severity of PH between patients with CPFE, IPF, or emphysema. The survival impact of PH in patients with CPFE was assessed using hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: A total of 13 eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 560, 720, and 316 patients with CPFE, IPF, and emphysema, respectively. Patients with CPFE had an increased PH risk with a higher frequency of pulmonary hypertension and higher estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (esPAP), compared with those with IPF (OR: 2.66; 95% CI: 1.55-4.57; P < 0.01; SMD: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.52-1.19; P < 0.01) or emphysema (OR: 3.19; 95% CI: 1.42-7.14; P < 0.01; SMD: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.50-0.96; P < 0.01). In addition, the patients with CPFE combined with PH had a poor prognosis than patients with CPFE without PH (HR: 6.16; 95% CI: 2.53-15.03; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that patients with CPFE were associated with a significantly higher risk of PH compared with those with IPF or emphysema alone. The presence of PH was a poor predictor of mortality.

Blood lead (Pb) is associated with lung fibrotic changes in non-smokers living in the vicinity of petrochemical complex: a population-based study.

Lead (Pb) is a toxic metal that has been extensively used in various industrial processes, and it persists in the environment, posing a continuous risk of exposure to humans. This study investigated blood lead levels in participants aged 20 years and older, who resided in Dalinpu for more than two years between 2016 to 2018, at Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital. Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry was used to analyze the blood samples for lead levels, and the LDCT (Low-Dose computed tomography) scans were interpreted by experienced radiologists. The blood lead levels were divided into quartiles, with Q1 representing levels of ≤1.10 µg/dL, Q2 representing levels of >1.11 and ≤1.60 µg/dL, Q3 representing levels of >1.61 and ≤2.30 µg/dL, and Q4 representing levels of >2.31 µg/dL. Individuals with lung fibrotic changes had significantly higher (mean ± SD) blood lead levels (1.88±1.27vs. 1.72±1.53 µg/dl, p< 0.001) than those with non-lung fibrotic changes. In multivariate analysis, we found that the highest quartile (Q4: >2.31 µg/dL) lead levels (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.01-1.82; p= 0.043) and the higher quartile (Q3: >1.61 and ≤2.30 µg/dL) (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.01-1.75; p= 0.041) was significantly associated with lung fibrotic changes compared with the lowest quartile (Q1: ≤1.10 µg/dL) (Cox and Snell R2, 6.1 %; Nagelkerke R2, 8.5 %). The dose-response trend was significant (Ptrend= 0.030). Blood lead exposure was significantly associated lung fibrotic change. To prevent lung toxicity, it is recommended to maintain blood lead levels lower than the current reference value.

Comparison of two antifibrotic treatments for lung fibrosis in post-COVID-19 syndrome: A randomized, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 infection is uncommon, it can lead to problems if not treated effectively in the early period. This study aimed to compare the effects of treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone in patients with COVID-19-related fibrosis. METHODS: Thirty patients who presented to the post-COVID outpatient clinic between May 2021 and April 2022 with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia and exhibited persistent cough, dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and low oxygen saturation at least 12 weeks after diagnosis were included. The patients were randomized to receive off-label treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone and were followed up for 12 weeks. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, all pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters, 6MWT distance, and oxygen saturation were increased compared to baseline in both the pirfenidone group and nintedanib groups, while heart rate and radiological score levels were decreased (p<0.05 for all). The changes in 6MWT distance and oxygen saturation were significantly greater in the nintedanib group than in the pirfenidone group (p=0.02 and 0.005, respectively). Adverse drug effects were more frequent with nintedanib than pirfenidone, with the most common being diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: In patients with interstitial fibrosis after COVID-19 pneumonia, both nintedanib and pirfenidone were observed to be effective in improving radiological score and PFT parameters. Nintedanib was more effective than pirfenidone in increasing exercise capacity and saturation values but caused more adverse drug effects.

Clusters of comorbidities in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a type of interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a variable disease course and prognosis ranging from inflammatory and self-limiting to irreversible and progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Comorbidities are common in HP and may have an impact on prognosis. Due to the heterogeneity of HP presentation and progression, the identification of specific phenotypes in relationship to disease course and outcome is essential. The aim of this study was to identify clusters of comorbidities which could represent phenotypes in fibrotic HP and examine their impact on prognosis. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with fibrotic HP at a tertiary referral center for ILD were included. Comorbidities were systematically registered and clusters of comorbidities were identified using cluster analyses. Disease progression and survival was estimated for each cluster. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 211 patients with 53.6% males, mean age 63.0, baseline FVC 72.7%, DLCO 44.1%. Median follow-up time was 1.8 years (IQR 0.7-3.9). Three clusters with distinct comorbidity profiles and clinical characteristics were identified. One cluster dominated by elder male patients with predominantly cardiovascular diseases was associated with more respiratory hospitalizations and a worse prognosis. Differences in pulmonary function or exercise capacity trajectories between clusters were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Three clusters with distinct comorbidities were identified and could represent phenotypes in fibrotic HP not previously recognized. The worst prognosis was observed in a cluster dominated by elder males with cardiovascular diseases. Increased focus on prevention and treatment of comorbidities could potentially improve the prognosis of patients with fibrotic HP.

Risk of Pulmonary Fibrosis and Persistent Symptoms Post-COVID-19 in a Cohort of Outpatient Health Workers.

Background: Infection by SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with multiple symptoms; however, still, little is known about persistent symptoms and their probable association with the risk of developing pulmonary fibrosis in patients post-COVID-19. Methods: A longitudinal prospective study on health workers infected by SARS-CoV-2 was conducted. In this work, signs and symptoms were recorded of 149 health workers with a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 at the beginning of the diagnosis, during the active infection, and during post-COVID-19 follow-up. The McNemar chi-square test was used to compare the proportions and percentages of symptoms between the baseline and each follow-up period. Results: The signs and symptoms after follow-up were cardiorespiratory, neurological, and inflammatory. Gastrointestinal symptoms were unusual at the disease onset, but unexpectedly, their frequency was higher in the post-infection stage. The multivariate analysis showed that pneumonia (HR 2.4, IC95%: 1.5−3.8, p < 0.001) and positive PCR tests still after four weeks (HR 5.3, IC95%: 2.3-12.3, p < 0.001) were factors associated with the diagnosis of post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis in this study group. Conclusions: Our results showed that pneumonia and virus infection persistence were risk factors for developing pulmonary fibrosis post-COVID-19, after months of initial infection.

Evaluation of lung adverse events with trastuzumab using the Japanese pharmacovigilance database.

The present study aimed to determine the risk of trastuzumab-induced lung toxicity, time to onset, and post hoc outcomes using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. We analyzed data for the period between April 2004 and March 2021. Data on lung toxicities were extracted, and relative risk of adverse events (AEs) was estimated using the reporting odds ratio. We analyzed 1,772,494 reports and identified 4362 reports of AEs caused by trastuzumab. Of these, 693 lung toxicities were reportedly associated with trastuzumab. Signals were detected for seven lung toxicities: interstitial lung disease, pulmonary edema, pleural effusion, lung disorder, acute pulmonary edema, pulmonary fibrosis, and radiation pneumonitis. Among these, interstitial lung disease was the most frequently reported (61.8%). A histogram of times to onset showed occurrence from 1 to 105 days, but some cases of interstitial lung disease occurred even more than one year after the start of administration. The AEs showing the highest fatality rates were interstitial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis, and radiation pneumonitis. This study focused on lung toxicities caused by trastuzumab as post-marketing AEs. Some cases could potentially involve serious outcomes; therefore, patients should be monitored for signs of the onset of these AEs not only at the start of administration, but also over an extended period, especially for interstitial lung disease.

Radiological unilateral pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis as a notable late complication after lung cancer surgery: incidence and perioperative associated factors.

OBJECTIVES: Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare idiopathic interstitial pneumonia characterized by pleural-parenchymal involvement, predominantly in the upper lobes. Unilateral upper lung field pulmonary fibrosis (upper-PF) that is radiologically consistent with PPFE reportedly develops after lung cancer surgery in the operated side and presents many clinical characteristics in common with PPFE. However, the incidence and perioperative associated factors remain unclear. METHODS: All consecutive patients with lung cancer resected completely from 2008 to 2016 were investigated retrospectively. Pre-/postoperative characteristics were compared between patients with and without unilateral upper-PF. Cumulative incidence curves were estimated using competing risk analysis. RESULTS: Among the 587 included patients, 25 patients (4.3%) were diagnosed as unilateral upper-PF. The 3-, 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of unilateral upper-PF was 2.3%, 3.3% and 5.3%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, male sex, presence of a pulmonary apical cap, lobar resection and low % vital capacity (%VC < 80%) were independent perioperative associated factors. The 10-year cumulative incidence was 6.3% in patients treated with lobar resection, 8.0% in male patients, 10.3% in patients with pulmonary apical cap and 14.5% in patients with low %VC. Postoperative pleural effusion at 6 months after surgery was much more common in the patients who later developed unilateral upper-PF (96.0% vs 24.2%). This pleural effusion persisted and was accompanied thereafter by pleural thickening and subpleural pulmonary fibrosis. During the clinical courses of 25 patients with unilateral upper-PF, 18 patients presented symptoms related to upper-PF and 6 patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral upper-PF is an occasional but under-recognized late complication after lung cancer surgery.

[Pulmonary fibrosis in patients with COVID-19: A review].

The viral infectious disease pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has affected over 500 million people and killed over 6 million. This is the official data provided by the WHO as of the end of May 2022. Among people who have recovered from COVID-19, post-COVID syndrome is quite common. Scattered epidemiological studies on post-COVID syndrome, however, indicate its high relevance. One of the manifestations of post-COVID syndrome is the development of pulmonary fibrosis (PF). This article is devoted to the analysis of literature data on epidemiology, immunomorphology, as well as X-ray morphological and functional characteristics of PF in patients with post-COVID syndrome. Attention is drawn to the various phenotypes of the post-COVID syndrome and the incidence of PF, which, as clinical practice shows, is most common in people who have had severe COVID-19. This article discusses in detail the molecular biological and immunological mechanisms of PF development. The fibrotic process of the lung parenchyma is not an early manifestation of the disease; as a rule, radiomorphological signs of this pathological process develop after four weeks from the onset of acute manifestations of a viral infection. The characteristic signs of PF include those that indicate the process of remodulation of the lung tissue: volumetric decrease in the lungs, "cellular" degeneration of the lung parenchyma, bronchiectasis and traction bronchiolectasis. The process of remodulating the lung tissue, in the process of fibrosis, is accompanied by a violation of the lung function; a particularly sensitive test of functional disorders is a decrease in the diffusion capacity of the lung tissue. Therefore, in the process of monitoring patients with post-COVID syndrome, a dynamic study of the ventilation function of the lungs is recommended. The main clinical manifestation of PF is dyspnea that occurs with minimal exertion. Shortness of breath also reflects another important aspect of fibrous remodulation of the lung parenchyma - oxygen dissociation is disturbed, which reflects a violation of the gas exchange function of the lungs. There are no generally accepted treatments for PF in post-COVID syndrome. The literature considers such approaches as the possibility of prescribing antifibrotic therapy, hyaluronidase, and medical gases: thermal helium, nitric oxide, and atomic hydrogen. The article draws attention to the unresolved issues of post-covid PF in people who have had COVID-19.

Pulmonary fibrosis in relation to genetic loci in an inception cohort of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis from northern Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary manifestations in RA are common comorbidities. Interstitial lung disease (ILD), both idiopathic and in RA, has been associated with several genetic variants. We assessed pulmonary fibrosis (PF) in an inception cohort of RA patients in relation to genetic variants and disease-related factors. METHODS: A total of 1466 early RA patients were consecutively included and followed prospectively from the index date until death or 31 December 2016. Clinical and laboratory data and treatment were continuously registered according to the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register. DNA was available from 1184 patients and 571 151 genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analysed. Thirteen identified genetic variants were extracted. At follow-up, the patients answered a questionnaire regarding disease progression and lung involvement that was validated by reviewing medical records and analysing radiological examinations. RESULTS: The prevalence of PF was 5.6% and the annualized incidence rate was 5.0/1000 (95% CI 3.80, 6.54). Four SNPs were associated with PF in RA: rs35705950 [MUC5B; OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.5, 4.0), adjusted P-value = 0.00016, q-value = 0.0021]; rs111521887 [TOLLIP; OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.3, 2.8), adjusted P-value = 0.0014, q-value = 0.0092]; rs2609255 [FAM13A; OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1, 2.5), adjusted P-value = 0.013, q-value = 0.055] and rs2736100 [TERT; OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.0, 2.2), adjusted P-value = 0.046, q-value = 0.15]. Older age and RF positivity were associated with increased risk, while MTX treatment was associated with a lower risk of PF. CONCLUSIONS: Development of PF in an inception cohort of RA patients was associated with 4 of 12 ILD risk genes. RA-related factors except for age at diagnosis and RF positivity were of limited importance in PF development.

Increasing incidence of lung transplantation in patients with post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis.

Twenty months into the COVID-19 pandemic, we are still learning about the various long-term consequences of COVID-19 infection. While many patients do recover with minimal long-term consequences, some patients develop irreversible parenchymal and interstitial lung damage leading to diffuse pulmonary fibrosis. Unfortunately, these are some of the consequences of post-SARS-CoV-2 infection which thousands more people around the world will experience and which will outlast the pandemic for a long time to come. It is now being observed at various leading medical centres around the world that lung transplantation may be the only meaningful treatment available to a select group of patients experiencing serious lung damage and non-resolving COVID-19-associated respiratory failure, resulting from the triad of coronavirus infection, a hyper-inflammatory immune response to it and the inability of the human body to repair that injury.